Every Canadian defence policy of the past fifty years has forewarned of a world plunging into chaos, yet none have truly delivered on their promises. Murray Brewster’s analysis for CBC News exposes this pattern of lofty rhetoric followed by disappointing outcomes.
The recent defence policy, unveiled amidst global turmoil, starkly contrasts with its predecessors. With conflicts raging in Europe and heightened tensions in the Arctic, the urgency for action is palpable. Gen. Wayne Eyre, Canada’s Chief of the Defence Staff, underscores the need to combat bureaucratic hurdles hindering policy implementation.
Despite acknowledging escalating global threats, the policy also serves political agendas, emphasizing climate change and Arctic security to garner support. Steve Saideman, a political scientist, suggests this strategy aims to appease a skeptical public and wary Parliament.
Brewster delves into past policies, highlighting the “decade of darkness” under Prime Minister Jean Chretien, where promised military commitments faltered amidst budget cuts. Similarly, the Conservative government’s proposal for nuclear-powered submarines was shelved amid fiscal constraints.
The recurring theme of delayed funding commitments echoes through history, from the Liberals’ supply ship replacement promise in 1994 to the Conservatives’ projected Armed Forces strength in 2028.
Dave Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, underscores the need for tangible action, noting that while promising initiatives exist, their impact remains uncertain.
In essence, Brewster’s analysis portrays a troubling narrative of missed targets and unfulfilled promises in Canadian defence policy—a cycle that demands breaking.
Discover more from Weekly Voice
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
